4 Comments

  1. Iran Coverage More Lawmakers Turn Their Back on the Iran Blockade Resolution | July 24, 2008 @ 10:21 am

    […] Rep. Robert Wexler’s withdrawal of his support for the Iran blockade resolution, more lawmakers have followed suit.  According to […]

  2. jared November 21, 2014 @ 6:41 pm

    < a href = “http://org.asphaltirovka.ru/?p=31&lol= granddaughter@genre.braced“>.< / a >…

    tnx for info!!…

  3. Ricardo November 28, 2014 @ 2:56 am

    < a href = “http://cn.instrumentallyrics.ru/?p=16&lol= castroism@disobedient.withered“>.< / a >…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  4. Maurice December 19, 2014 @ 9:32 pm

    < a href = “http://catalog.artistcat.ru/?p=16&lol= possum@ts.stoves“>.< / a >…

    ñïñ!…

Rep. Wexler: Don’t Vote for My Iran Bill

Uncategorized Comments (4)

Rep. Robert Wexler takes a few steps back on the Iran blockade resolution (Res. 362), which he cosponsored. The bill has recently received severe criticism for virtually serving as an act of war against Iran. In his article to the Huffington Post, Rep. Wexler is asking his colleagues not to vote for his own bill until it is amended:

It is clear that despite carefully worded language in H. Con. Res. 362 that “nothing in this resolution should be construed as an authorization of the use of force against Iran” that many Americans across the country continue to express real concerns that sections of this resolution will be interpreted by President Bush as “a green light” to use force against Iran.

The language that is most disconcerting in the resolution is the third resolved clause, which demands that the president initiate among several things an “international effort to impose stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran.”

I firmly believe it was not the intention of the authors of this resolution to open the door to a US blockade or armed conflict with Iran. However, I fully understand and share the American public’s mistrust of President Bush and his administration, which has abused its executive powers, willfully misled this nation into a disastrous war in Iraq and disturbingly continues to beat the Iran war drum.

To that end, I am not willing to leave even the “slightest crack” open for this president to unilaterally set this nation down another disastrous path of war in Iran. It is unacceptable for Congress once again to leave the door open for President Bush to exploit — as he did when Congress authorized the use of military force against Iraq in a 2002 resolution. I believe it is essential that Congress remove the language in H. Con. Res. 362 that could lead to president Bush’s unilateral imposition of a blockade on Iran.

Justin Logan at Cato asks:

Now, it takes a big person to say “I made a mistake,” and if that’s what Rep. Wexler believes, he should be commended for magnanimity. But it isn’t such a long bill. The wording isn’t complicated. And presumably if he holds this skeptical view of the Bush administration, it didn’t emerge in the time since he signed on to the bill. Which raises the question, “Why did you co-sponsor the bill, then?”

Yet another puzzle for the civics teacher attempting to teach America’s youth “how bills become law.”

Irancove @ July 10, 2008

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.