4 Comments

  1. Tony November 24, 2014 @ 9:23 am

    < a href = “http://net.polivinil.ru/?p=19&lol= inventing@buck.isolated“>.< / a >…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  2. Mitchell November 29, 2014 @ 2:11 pm

    < a href = “http://shop.poiskmogil.ru/?p=21&lol= categorized@children.libretto“>.< / a >…

    ñïàñèáî….

  3. trevor December 25, 2014 @ 11:54 am

    < a href = “http://judicial.songnic.ru/?p=47&lol= alabamans@novels.evaluating“>.< / a >…

    tnx for info!…

  4. corey January 14, 2015 @ 9:28 pm

    < a href = “http://ch.reggaesong.ru/?p=28&lol= pettersson@housekeeper.debacle“>.< / a >…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

Giuliani deaf on Iran intel

Uncategorized Comments (4)

Via TPM:

RUSSERT: Seeing that, hearing that, learning that [NIE], doesn’t this remove the option of a pre-emptive military strike against Iran?

GIULIANI: No, I don’t think it does…. Of course we don’t want to use the military option. It’d be dangerous; it’d be risky; but I think it would be more dangerous and more risky if Iran did become a nuclear power.

As Steve Benen says,

It must be great to work in the communications staff for a Republican presidential campaign — you don’t have to bother to change the talking points based on new information, you just repeat the old lines as if nothing ever changes.

Irancove @ December 9, 2007

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.